Making Tech Sane Again
I’ll admit it, I’m a tech nerd. Or, at least, as much of a tech nerd as one is likely to find in an English department.
I’m a scholar of medieval literature by trade. I think medievalists bring a useful perspective to technology: a kind of historical awareness that allows us to be “novelty agnostic,” viewing technology as more of a collection of useful functions rather than a progressive march toward perfection. This approach allows us to ask not “what’s the newest thing?” but rather “what’s the best technology for the job?” in an awareness that the best tool for the job might potentially be a very old one just as easily as the newest one.
One thing all scholars in the humanities do all the time is write, and taking my “medievalist mind” to the available technologies for doing that has enabled me to discover some tools that in some ways are older and less “high tech” than other options, but, for the same reason, are also so much more stable, more sustainable, and so much easier to manage that they’ll make your “modern” office suite seem downright clunky by comparison.
To understand how working in plain text is helpful, think about the tools you normally use to write on a computer. If you’re like most, you default to a traditional “word processor” such as Microsoft Word. But consider this: have you ever had a problem with Word where some strange formatting seems to have infiltrated your document and you can’t get rid of it, no matter what you do or what settings you change? Have you ever had a Word document behave in infuriatingly odd ways for no apparent reason? Well, there is a reason, which is that Word documents are actually extremely complicated beasts. For example, a single sentence in Word might appear to be very simple. However, underneath what you can see, there’s a huge amount of code that you don’t can’t. As an experiment for this post, I typed a single sentence in Word, and then revealed the underlying code: there was over nine pages of code for that solitary sentence.
Hence one big reason Word tends to misbehave, and misbehave more the more you work with a document. As you add edits, elements such as images, copy text from other sources, rearrange blocks of text, add and fiddle with footnotes and endnotes–in other words, most of the things an academic does with documents all the time–the more of that code is inserted and has to interact with previous code, and the more complex it becomes. No wonder your document starts behaving as though it’s possessed by something unholy the more you manipulate it.
On the other hand, a plain-text file contains only the ascii characters that you type. A plain text file in which you type:
This is a simple sentence in plain text.
contains only the characters you typed, nothing else. If you make edits, rearrange things, paste in text from elsewhere, make lots of revisions over time, add sources, etc., you’re only rearranging and addind your text.
While a file from an office suite might (kinda falsely) boast, “what you see is what you get,” a plain-text file can easily affirm that what you see is what is there. No shenanigans.
A few other advantages of plain text:
I should mention that this entire blog post was composed in a basic plain-text editor, called Vim, an editor that runs simply in a terminal, and has been around since the late 1980’s! These words have never seen Word, and never will!
Convinced? If so, stay tuned for more posts on working with plain-text writing tools.
Comments powered by Talkyard.